← Search

Chad Brooks

Savannah, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
41 matches · 22W–19L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Chad Brooks to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
L
2026-09-10 · BP - Bakhtiari · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sean Caldwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-03 · BP - Bakhtiari · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Costanzo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-11 · BP - Kowalewski · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meagan Frye
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-21 · BP - Kowalewski · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-03-26 · BP-Caldwell · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Dodson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-03-19 · BP-Caldwell · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Todd Swezey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-12 · BP-Caldwell · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Todd Swezey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-05 · BP-Caldwell · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sean Caldwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-02-12 · BP-Caldwell · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Dodson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-01-22 · SATA/Edward Kowalewski · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andre Niederberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-12-23 · SATA/Edward Kowalewski · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Pryor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-12-09 · SATA/Edward Kowalewski · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andre Niederberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
56.8%
21W–16L · 51.6% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer