← Search

David OBanion

Atlanta, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
17 matches · 8W–9L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add David OBanion to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history17 matches
W
2026-07-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cody Tackett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-3
L
Daniel Goorsky / Charlie Taibi
2026-06-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erik Day
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erik Day
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-01-20 · DeKalb TC (Tyler Fabbri)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kyle Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-11 · Dekalb TC (Tyler Fabbri)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicholas Terpstra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-03-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aaron Walter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 3-6
W
Jeff Olson / Michael Smith
2025-02-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aaron Walter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-02-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Greg Boyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-01-23 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-01-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicholas Terpstra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 6-2
W
Thai Truong / Conner Bryan
2024-07-07 · DeKalb TC (Tyler Fabbri)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kyle Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2024-06-16 · DeKalb TC (Tyler Fabbri)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Riggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
60%
3W–2L · 50.4% of games
3.5
50%
5W–5L · 52.9% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
5 matches
#1 Singles
29%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova