← Search

Martha Langer

Las Vegas, NV
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
248 matches · 85W–163L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Martha Langer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history248 matches
L
2026-08-03 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #2 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Rochelle Hamatian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
Courtney Long / Kinsey Wolanski
2026-07-27 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #3 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Shannon Demus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-13 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #1 Female Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-09 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #3 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Carrie Daly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-06 · CLUB RIDGES · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christy Cropper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-30 · CLUB RIDGES · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-16 · CLUB RIDGES · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-09 · CLUB RIDGES · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-26 · LAKE LAS VEGAS SPORTS CLUB · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lee Jaquiss mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-25 · CLUB RIDGES · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shannon Demus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-18 · CLUB RIDGES · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Lake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-11 · CLUB RIDGES · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
44.4%
36W–45L · 49.1% of games
3.0
28%
40W–103L · 38.3% of games
6.0
40%
2W–3L · 44.9% of games
5.5mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 52.5% of games
6.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 23.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 29% of the time
#3 Doubles
29%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
67 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
31 matches
#3 Female Doubles
11%
28 matches
#2 Female Doubles
9%
22 matches
#1 Singles
5%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal