← Search

Lisa Ray

— year-end
133 matches · 80W–53L · seasons 2021–2027

Captains: add Lisa Ray to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history133 matches
W
2026-08-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Warechowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-08-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Taylor Cranford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-12 · Post Oak Rec (Lisa Ray)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Lotz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Warechowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · Chadds Walk (Lisa Ray)* · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kirti Dahiya
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
Robin Schorr / Kelly Richardson
2026-07-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brandi Cheeley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-30 · Chadds Walk (Lisa Ray)* · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-26 · Post Oak Rec (Lisa Ray)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Grasso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 5-7
W
2026-06-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenna Shetty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
Amber Moore
2026-06-23 · Chadds Walk (Lisa Ray)* · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-23 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kirti Dahiya
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-22 · Chadds Walk (Lisa Ray)* · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sarah Grasso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
Teams28 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
88.9%
16W–2L · 66.6% of games
4.0
57.1%
48W–36L · 52.1% of games
4.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 45.2% of games
3.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 51.5% of games
4.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 56.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
28 matches
#1 Singles
18%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
24 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe