← Search

Teena Griggs

Seattle, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
138 matches · 87W–51L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Teena Griggs to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history138 matches
L
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Amy Hsu championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Amy Hsu championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Amy Hsu championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-20 · EDG-Ace, Ace Baby-Kelly · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rajive Kilambi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Tracey Hsia championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-07 · NWW-EDG-Debiec · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Hsu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-31 · NWW-EDG-Debiec · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Felicia van Pelt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-29 · NWW-EDG-Debiec · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Hsu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-05-10 · NWW-EDG-Debiec · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Hsu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-03-15 · GTC-Farnham/Yara · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Aline Pereira
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-07 · GTC-Farnham/Yara · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Aline Pereira
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-01 · GTC-Farnham/Yara · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Teresa Masumoto-Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
78.6%
33W–9L · 62.8% of games
4.5
61.1%
22W–14L · 52% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
64%
16W–9L · 54.7% of games
9.0mixed
40%
6W–9L · 48.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
37 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams