← Search

Tina Weber

— year-end
52 matches · 18W–34L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Tina Weber to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history52 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Weber-Wise Aces-Woodlands Parks · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Line Kristensen Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-26 · Weber-Wise Aces-Woodlands Parks · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cammy Crawford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-15 · Weber-Wise Aces-Woodlands Parks · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Lou Suss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-08 · Weber-Wise Aces 3.5-Woodlands · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kaley Majeski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-01 · Weber-Wise Aces 4.0-Woodlands · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-24 · Weber-Wise Aces 3.5-Woodlands · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maria Faverola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-08 · Weber-Wise Aces 3.5-Woodlands · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-03 · Weber-Wise Aces 4.0-Woodlands · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Bovolenta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-15 · Cypresswood - Lee · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Season Flannery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-05-08 · Cypresswood - Lee · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Season Flannery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-06 · Weber-Wise Aces 3.5-Woodlands · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kaley Majeski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-04-23 · Weber-Wise Aces 4.0-Woodlands Parks · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Teams38 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
34.8%
8W–15L · 46.4% of games
4.0
20%
1W–4L · 30.2% of games
7.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 53.2% of games
7.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 46% of games
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
8 matches
#2 Singles
12%
6 matches
#1 Singles
8%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer