← Search

Hallye Phillips

San Angelo, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 44W–46L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Hallye Phillips to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
W
Ashley Snook / Jannice Rivero
2026-08-13 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Maria Munoz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-06 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Melia Pullig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-06 · Diaz · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Counts mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
Brady Wetz / Monica Poulsen
2026-06-29 · Diaz · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Counts mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
Drew Springer / Ashley Snook
2026-06-22 · Diaz · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Counts mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-15 · Diaz · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Counts mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Callie Bryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mandy Weaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-18 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Westbrook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Callie Bryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-07 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
75%
21W–7L · 55.2% of games
4.0
23.5%
4W–13L · 36.1% of games
6.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 50% of games
7.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 46.6% of games
7.0mixed
37.5%
6W–10L · 52.1% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 48.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
31 matches
#1 Singles
20%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
16 matches
#2 Singles
9%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer