← Search

Micah Lacefield

— year-end
224 matches · 91W–133L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Micah Lacefield to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history224 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Mid Tri M IRCD Zacher · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rob Riskin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-09-02 · Mid Tri M IRCD Zacher · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rob Riskin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
David Graham / Khadija Stewart
2026-08-07 · Indy X18 8.0 IRCD Chien · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janis Buesching mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-05 · Mid Tri M IRCD Zacher · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rob Riskin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-31 · Indy X18 8.0 IRCD Chien · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sofia Soltis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
Renee Noe / Christopher Leagre
2026-07-19 · Indy X18 8.0 IRCD Chien · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janis Buesching mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-16 · Indy A18 4.0M WIRC Bruner · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-14 · Indy X18 8.0 IRCD Chien · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janis Buesching mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-1
W
2026-07-09 · Indy X18 8.0 IRCD Chien · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Yaping Saran mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
W
Bradley Rothaar
2026-06-27 · Indy A18 4.0M WIRC Bruner · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
Sean Warner / Charlie Warner
2026-06-18 · Indy A18 4.0M WIRC Bruner · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Musson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-27 · Indy 7.5M IRCD Zacher · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Adam Zacher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-4
Teams16 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
33.3%
5W–10L · 42.6% of games
3.5
52.6%
20W–18L · 55.1% of games
4.0
32.4%
11W–23L · 45.2% of games
7.5
31.7%
19W–41L · 44.6% of games
8.5
18.8%
3W–13L · 41.6% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 53.4% of games
7.5mixed
55.6%
10W–8L · 47.3% of games
8.0mixed
48.3%
14W–15L · 48.7% of games
8.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
88 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
44 matches
#1 Singles
15%
34 matches
#2 Singles
5%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer