← Search

Emily Wiersema

Seattle, WA
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
46 matches · 22W–24L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Emily Wiersema to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history46 matches
W
2026-05-15 · RBW-Racquet Rascals-Lau · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-05-03 · RBW-Racquet Rascals-Lau · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-26 · RBW-Racquet Rascals-Lau · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Mei Lau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-04-18 · RBW-Racquet Rascals-Lau · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sara Farag
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-03-28 · RBW-Racquet Rascals-Lau · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Vera Makianich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-02-17 · Queens of the Court · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
Heeyeon Lee
2026-02-14 · ETC-Serveivors-Flodin · #1 Female Singles · 2.5 mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3
L
2026-02-08 · ETC-Serveivors-Flodin · #1 Female Doubles · 2.5 · with Xinbei Gong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6
W
Bethari Kamarga / Yuzhe Zhou
2026-01-25 · ETC-Serveivors-Flodin · #1 Female Doubles · 2.5 · with Vera Makianich mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2
W
Luke Cao / Bethari Kamarga
2026-01-25 · ETC-Serveivors-Flodin · #1 Mixed Doubles · 2.5 · with Sai Gokul Kanakala mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1
L
2026-01-18 · ETC-Serveivors-Flodin · #1 Female Doubles · 2.5 · with Vera Makianich mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6
L
Victoria Chatron-Michaud / Hannah Luc
2026-01-10 · ETC-Serveivors-Flodin · #1 Female Doubles · 2.5 · with Aurora Tian mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
20%
1W–4L · 38.3% of games
2.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 57.4% of games
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 37.8% of games
0.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 71.7% of games
2.5mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 49.5% of games
3.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 48.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Female Doubles, 24% of the time
#1 Female Doubles
24%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
10 matches
#1 Female Singles
15%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
6 matches
#1 Singles
9%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer