← Search

Matt Slimming

— year-end
116 matches · 79W–37L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Matt Slimming to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history116 matches
L
2026-08-08 · Arthur-55/6.5/M-StoneCreek · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with William Gillane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-28 · Eckholdt-Arthur/40s/3.5/SC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daysi Valencia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-07-22 · Arthur-Eckholdt/55s/3.5/SC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Roy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-21 · Rolling/40s/4.0/SC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Windy Montecino mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-14 · Eckholdt-Arthur/40s/3.5/SC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Slimming mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · Eckholdt-Arthur/40s/3.5/SC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Slimming mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · Rolling/40s/4.0/SC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daysi Valencia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-27 · Eckholdt-Arthur/40s/3.5/SC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Slimming mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
W
CLAY BENTON / Jennifer Harris
2026-06-24 · Arthur-Eckholdt/55s/3.5/SC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allyson Davis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-23 · Rolling/40s/4.0/SC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Rolling mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-22 · Eckholdt-Arthur/40s/3.5/SC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rhonda Eckholdt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-04 · Arthur-Eckholdt/55s/3.5/SC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yvette Favret mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
Teams54 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
70%
35W–15L · 59.3% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 43.9% of games
6.5
70.8%
17W–7L · 60.5% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 53.1% of games
3.5mixed
77.4%
24W–7L · 60.4% of games
4.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
29 matches
#1 Singles
15%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
14 matches
#2 Singles
5%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer