← Search

Tate Seefried

— year-end
18 matches · 8W–10L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Tate Seefried to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history18 matches
W
2026-05-30 · HBSQ-Harbor Squarrels-Robey · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Gustinis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-05-24 · HBSQ-Harbor Squarrels-Robey · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Abram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2024-08-24 · #3 Doubles · with Wolf Yeigh championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2024-08-23 · #2 Doubles · with Wolf Yeigh championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2024-05-18 · HBSQ-Yeigh 4.5M · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mick Horton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-05-10 · HBSQ-Yeigh 4.5M · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Wolf Yeigh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2024-04-28 · HBSQ-Yeigh 4.5M · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2024-04-07 · HBSQ-Yeigh 4.5M · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2024-03-23 · #3 Doubles · with Samuel Bradley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2024-02-17 · NWW-HBSQ-Robey · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wolf Yeigh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2024-02-11 · NWW-HBSQ-Robey · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wolf Yeigh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2022-04-30 · HBSQ-Yeigh · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Wolf Yeigh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
Teams4 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
75%
6W–2L · 60.6% of games
4.5
0%
0W–7L · 32.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
3 matches
#2 Singles
11%
2 matches
#1 Singles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert