← Search

Lisa Goodman

— year-end
30 matches · 16W–14L · seasons 2020–2025

Captains: add Lisa Goodman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history30 matches
W
2025-02-25 · Sugar and Slice · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-01-28 · Sugar and Slice · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-01-21 · Sugar and Slice · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Anne Vaughn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2024-11-26 · Sugar and Slice · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicole Copeland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2024-11-05 · Sugar and Slice · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2024-10-29 · Sugar and Slice · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Vengerik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2024-10-22 · Sugar and Slice · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2024-10-15 · Sugar and Slice · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2024-04-09 · Sugar and Slice · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Renee Marchand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2024-03-26 · Sugar and Slice · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Paulsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2024-03-12 · Sugar and Slice · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Paulsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2024-01-09 · Sugar and Slice · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Renee Marchand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-4
Teams7 teams · 2020–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
51.9%
14W–13L · 54.4% of games
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 77% of the time
#1 Doubles
77%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams