← Search

Miguel Fernandes

— year-end
65 matches · 38W–27L · seasons 2020–2022

Captains: add Miguel Fernandes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
W
2022-03-26 · NITA 35M40c TAM (Kanev) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leo Kanev
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2022-03-13 · NITA 35M40c TAM (Kanev) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Simonetti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2022-03-06 · NITA 35M18 Naperville TC (Esancy) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leo Kanev
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2022-03-06 · NITA 35M40c TAM (Kanev) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leo Kanev
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2022-03-05 · NITA 35M40c TAM (Kanev) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leo Kanev
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2022-02-26 · NITA 35M40c TAM (Kanev) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leo Kanev
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
Sandeep Etta / Amit Sharma
2022-02-12 · NITA 35M18 Naperville TC (Esancy) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leo Kanev
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2022-02-05 · NITA 35M40c TAM (Kanev) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leo Kanev
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2022-01-30 · NITA 35M40c TAM (Kanev) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leo Kanev
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2021-12-19 · NITA E 35M18b Naperville TC (Esancy) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leo Kanev
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2021-12-12 · NITA E 35M18b Naperville TC (Esancy) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barry Dauber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2021-12-05 · NITA E 35M40c TAM (Kanev) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Simonetti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
Teams8 teams · 2021–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
100%
4W–0L · 80% of games
3.5
57.9%
33W–24L · 55.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
42%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
6 matches
#1 Singles
6%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer