← Search

Kathleen Kenneally

Manorville, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
183 matches · 107W–76L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Kathleen Kenneally to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history183 matches
L
Tori Bender / Julia Kelly
2026-08-16 · #2 Doubles · with Dianne Romano championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Heidi Cifelli championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Heidi Cifelli championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-14 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-06 · Blue Point, Cifelli (D) · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Heidi Cifelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-30 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Laura Crain / Sivan Chapman
2026-07-29 · #4 Doubles · with Dianne Romano championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-23 · Blue Point, Cifelli · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dianne Romano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-22 · LI: Blue Point, Mazzarone · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-20 · Blue Point, Cifelli (D) · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dianne Romano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-15 · Blue Point, Cifelli (D) · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Heidi Cifelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
40%
2W–3L · 51.9% of games
3.5
66.7%
32W–16L · 56.1% of games
4.0
29.8%
14W–33L · 39.6% of games
7.0
90.5%
19W–2L · 69.2% of games
8.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 48.6% of games
6.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 54.8% of games
7.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 47.3% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
39 matches
#4 Doubles
10%
18 matches
#1 Singles
6%
11 matches
#2 Singles
4%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert