← Search

Michael Hooper

— year-end
9 matches · 5W–4L · seasons 2026–2027

Captains: add Michael Hooper to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history9 matches
L
2026-09-12 · Team 5 JCC/Roberts-Cytron M4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Rubel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-06-28 · JCC/Roberts-Cytron M4.0 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-21 · JCC/Roberts-Cytron M4.0 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-14 · JCC/Roberts-Cytron M4.0 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-07 · JCC/Roberts-Cytron M4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Buchhalter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-05-31 · JCC/Roberts-Cytron M4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Siddharth Sethy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-17 · JCC/Roberts-Cytron M4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Taylor Brisch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-05-07 · JCC/Roberts-Cytron M4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Siddharth Sethy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-26 · JCC/Roberts-Cytron M4.0 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
Teams2 teams · 2026–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
4.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 53.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
4 matches
#2 Singles
33%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
1 match
#1 Singles
11%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova