← Search

Isabel Mendelsohn

Summit, NJ
4.0S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
30 matches · 13W–17L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Isabel Mendelsohn to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history30 matches
L
2026-03-26 · Dream Team · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Moylan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-05 · Dream Team · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marisa Amador
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-26 · Dream Team · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Moylan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-02-19 · Dream Team · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Moylan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-05 · Dream Team · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-3
L
Jessica Mills / Collette Warren
2025-10-09 · Dream Team · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Victoria May
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-09-25 · Dream Team · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sunny Wallin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2021-04-18 · Centercourt Chatham · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2021-04-13 · NJ: Centercourt Chatham · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Niki Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2021-04-06 · NJ: Centercourt Chatham · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
Emily King / Susan Walsh
2021-02-23 · NJ: Centercourt Chatham · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Madhuri Reddy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
L
2021-02-16 · NJ: Centercourt Chatham · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
52.9%
9W–8L · 45.9% of games
3.5
50%
3W–3L · 37.2% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 27.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 47% of the time
#3 Doubles
47%
14 matches
#1 Singles
33%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova