← Search

Jack Nazy

Saint Paul, MN
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
27 matches · 21W–6L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Jack Nazy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history27 matches
W
2026-07-16 · King 5.0 Summer 2026 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with John Trimble
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-11 · King 5.0 Summer 2026 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with John Trimble
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-06-09 · King Summer 2026 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Isabel Thiner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-28 · King 5.0 Summer 2026 · #1 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-05-21 · King 5.0 Summer 2026 · #1 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-15 · King Summer 2026 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Isabel Thiner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-26 · King Winter 2026 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Larson Ringlien
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-01-29 · King Winter 2026 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Aashish Bharath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-22 · King Winter 2026 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Scott Wall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-01-15 · King Winter 2026 · #1 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-11-19 · Haller/Nazy Early Start 2026 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Larson Ringlien
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-11-12 · Haller/Nazy Early Start 2026 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
78.6%
11W–3L · 58.4% of games
5.0
75%
6W–2L · 52.2% of games
9.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 58.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 37% of the time
#1 Singles
37%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
6 matches
#2 Singles
4%
1 match
#3 Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams