← Search

Stephanie Cantrell

— year-end
21 matches · 9W–12L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Stephanie Cantrell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history21 matches
L
2026-09-02 · Sugar Creek - Tri Angels · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Brooke Lubojasky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-12 · Sugar Creek - Tri Angels · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Brenda Crocker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-22 · Sugar Creek · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Morley Peabody
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-05-15 · Sugar Creek · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexa Fell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-08 · Sugar Creek · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexa Fell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-04-17 · Sugar Creek · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Irma Powers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-11-07 · Sugar Creek - Happy Hour · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicolette Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 5-7, 0-1
L
2025-10-10 · Sugar Creek - Happy Hour · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Irma Powers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-03 · Sugar Creek - Happy Hour · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sophia James
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
Sarah Boyd / Mel Rice
2025-09-19 · Sugar Creek - Happy Hour · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Koop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-06-20 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Darlene Granados
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-06 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
Teams5 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 55.4% of games
4.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 40% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
5 matches
#1 Singles
19%
4 matches
#2 Singles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert