← Search

Sally Bailey

Bethesda, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
144 matches · 73W–71L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sally Bailey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history144 matches
W
2026-08-09 · PLEASANTON 40MX7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bob Heeter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-08-03 · PLEASANTON 40MX7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Sheffield mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-02 · PLEASANTON 40MX7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Doug van Slyke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-26 · PLEASANTON 40MX7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Oscar Ham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-30 · PLEASANTON 40MX7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Sheffield mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
Srinika Narayan
2026-06-26 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-20 · PLEASANTON 40MX7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ronald Noriesta mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-14 · CASTLEWOOD CC 18AW3.5A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Owens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-11 · RUBY HILL GC 18AW4.0A-DT · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Owens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-11 · PLEASANTON 40MX7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Harikumar Somakumar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-21 · THE CLUB @LIVERMORE 18AW4.0A · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-20 · CASTLEWOOD CC 18AW3.5A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lorna Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
86.2%
25W–4L · 70.4% of games
3.5
48.1%
25W–27L · 52.1% of games
4.0
33.3%
8W–16L · 45.4% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
21.4%
3W–11L · 37.2% of games
7.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
27 matches
#1 Singles
4%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer