← Search

Sarah Abbott

— year-end
58 matches · 43W–15L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Sarah Abbott to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history58 matches
L
2026-08-20 · Parker/JB/JCC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rebecca Harrington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-17 · Parker/JB/3OAKS · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mollie Vance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-08 · Parker/JB/3OAKS · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mollie Vance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-06 · Parker/JB/3Oaks · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Evins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · Parker/JB/3OAKS · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mollie Vance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-18 · Parker/JB/3Oaks · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Evins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-21 · Parker/JB/3Oaks · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cory Kyle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-05 · Parker-Witherspoon/JB/RPCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mallory Hurst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-22 · Parker-Witherspoon/JB/RPCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mollie Vance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-21 · Plumlee Team2/MH/LR&F · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tabitha Inboden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-19 · Parker-Witherspoon/JB/RPCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mollie Vance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-13 · Plumlee Team2/MH/LR&F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maggie Playter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Teams20 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 66.9% of games
3.5
80%
16W–4L · 63.4% of games
4.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 46.2% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
100%
8W–0L · 69.9% of games
3.5mixed
75%
6W–2L · 52.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
11 matches
#1 Singles
5%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King