← Search

Frances Pruett

Tuscaloosa, AL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
26 matches · 14W–12L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Frances Pruett to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history26 matches
W
2026-06-25 · Pruett TriLevel 2026 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Libby Patton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-18 · Pruett TriLevel 2026 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kelly Verzino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-29 · Pruett TriLevel 2026 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Leigh Terry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-21 · Pruett TriLevel 2026 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Leigh Terry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-04-02 · 3.5 Pruett Spring · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Olivia Bradford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-26 · 3.5 Pruett Spring · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Olivia Bradford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-02-26 · 3.5 Pruett Spring · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lacy Lavender
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-02-19 · 3.5 Pruett Spring · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Codie Marynowitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-02-12 · 3.5 Pruett Spring · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Olivia Bradford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-09-25 · 6.5 Pruett combo · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Melissa Jacobs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-11 · 6.5 Pruett combo · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rebecca Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-06-19 · Pruett Tri 2025 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Blakely Blakeney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
60%
3W–2L · 48.5% of games
3.0
80%
4W–1L · 54.5% of games
3.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 47.4% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 47.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 54% of the time
#2 Doubles
54%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe