← Search

Jennifer Hoffmann

Harrison, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
80 matches · 49W–31L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Hoffmann to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
L
2026-06-25 · Life Time Diamond 18+ 3.5 Day · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-5
L
2026-06-11 · Life Time Diamond 18+ 3.5 Day · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-22 · Life Time Diamond 18+ 3.5 Day · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patty Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-14 · Life Time Diamond 18+ 3.5 Day · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nefertiti Greene
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-5
W
2026-03-16 · Life Time Pearl · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patty Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-02-24 · Life Time Diamond · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patty Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-02-10 · Life Time Diamond · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-12-11 · Life Time Diamond · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Simone Ririmasse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-11-13 · Life Time Diamond · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Simone Ririmasse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-11-04 · Life Time Diamond · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rossana Daddio-Menna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-07-09 · LifeTime JADE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kate Plemich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-18 · LifeTime JADE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
66.7%
22W–11L · 60.3% of games
3.5
57.8%
26W–19L · 55.1% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
19 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams