← Search

Jace Hagmann

Landenberg, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
31 matches · 10W–21L · seasons 2020–2025

Captains: add Jace Hagmann to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history31 matches
L
2025-07-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Norcross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Norcross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2025-05-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rogelio Mosqueda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2025-04-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Norcross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
David Pearl / Richard Pearl
2024-07-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Norcross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2024-07-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Norcross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2024-07-11 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Schlesinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2024-06-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2024-06-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Norcross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
Tim Hoffman / Richard McCarthy
2024-06-03 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Larry Sprouse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2024-05-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Deschere
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-05-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Immanuel Rufus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
24%
6W–19L · 41% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 57.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer