← Search

Kate Fix

— year-end
185 matches · 134W–51L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Kate Fix to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history185 matches
W
2026-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hadley Gerrish
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dina Weinstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-07 · CP: SYR Doubled: Piazza/Hodgson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jocelyn Michels
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Clare Ansel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-18 · CP: SYR Doubled: Piazza/Hodgson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Isabela Rizo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-17 · Innis Arden: Net Assets 4.0 W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurie Hoffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-3
L
Rebecca Dickson / Jennifer Shim
2026-06-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Soliman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-10 · Innis Arden: Net Assets 4.0 W · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patricia Vary-Loflin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3
L
2026-06-03 · Innis Arden: Net Assets 4.0 W · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jocelyn Michels
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6
W
2026-06-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charlotte Koster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allyson Wuensch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-28 · CP: SYR Doubled: Piazza/Hodgson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janine Huiskes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
Teams44 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
77.4%
48W–14L · 63% of games
3.5
70.9%
73W–30L · 58.5% of games
4.0
62.5%
10W–6L · 51.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
69 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
69 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
38 matches
#1 Singles
4%
8 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal