← Search

JOSEPH MATHERS

Charlottesville, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
17 matches · 7W–10L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add JOSEPH MATHERS to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history17 matches
L
2026-05-28 · ACAC - Profitt/Fendley · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chris Stambaugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-18 · ACAC - Profitt/Fendley · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mark Critchfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-14 · ACAC - Profitt/Fendley · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mark Critchfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-06 · ACAC - Profitt/Fendley · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mark Critchfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-10-13 · Dellimore - ACAC Aces · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
W
2025-10-06 · Dellimore - ACAC Aces · #3 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-09-13 · Dellimore - ACAC Aces · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
Alex Wermeling / Howell Fendley
2025-06-16 · ACAC Drop Shots-Dellimore · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amit Shahane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2025-06-02 · ACAC Drop Shots-Dellimore · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chike Dellimore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-05-27 · AHS Net Neutrality-Benham · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Fredrick Hanna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-06 · AHS Net Neutrality-Benham · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peter Gunter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-04-22 · AHS Net Neutrality-Benham · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 40.5% of games
4.5
40%
4W–6L · 49.8% of games
9.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
4 matches
#1 Singles
12%
2 matches
#2 Singles
12%
2 matches
#2 Doubles
6%
1 match
#3 Singles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams