← Search

V Kate Ferguson

— year-end
246 matches · 134W–112L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add V Kate Ferguson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history246 matches
L
2026-08-26 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Cerny
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-12 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Back
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-06 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Amanda Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-30 · SPANISH TRAIL · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Graybeal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-05-01 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS #1 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kim Haines
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-25 · SPANISH TRAIL · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mary Lynn Weber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-18 · SPANISH TRAIL · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with April Denise Belcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-17 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS #1 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Leslie Gallant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-10 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS #1 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Aida Tracy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-29 · SPANISH TRAIL · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with April Denise Belcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-03-27 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS #1 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Thalia Vidal Roper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-03-14 · SPANISH TRAIL · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dena Deluca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Teams45 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 29% of games
4.0
73.3%
88W–32L · 59.1% of games
4.5
33.8%
26W–51L · 41.1% of games
8.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 55.3% of games
8.5mixed
38.5%
5W–8L · 41.2% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
69 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
60 matches
#1 Singles
24%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
41 matches
#2 Singles
5%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams