← Search

Taylor TerBurgh

— year-end
56 matches · 26W–30L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Taylor TerBurgh to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
L
2026-04-27 · TerBurgh/Memphis · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
Gina Smith / Stephanie White
2026-04-18 · TerBurgh/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Ansel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-16 · TerBurgh/Memphis · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
Jhansi Yadlapati
2026-03-28 · TerBurgh/Memphis · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-22 · TerBurgh/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jo Picha
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-01 · Higgins/Memphis · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2025-10-18 · Higgins/Memphis · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-10-12 · Sentilles/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mollie Tamboli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-10-08 · Sentilles/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
Susana Cunningham / Lisa Evans
2025-09-07 · Bratton/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katie Ansel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2025-07-15 · Bratton/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Victoria Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2025-07-01 · Bratton/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adrienne Herbek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
Teams55 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
55.6%
10W–8L · 52.2% of games
3.5
23.1%
6W–20L · 37.6% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 65.5% of games
3.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Singles, 30% of the time
#2 Singles
30%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
11 matches
#1 Singles
14%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
9%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova