← Search

Burke Franklin

Newbury Park, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
254 matches · 157W–97L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Burke Franklin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history254 matches
L
2026-08-09 · Chief Peak · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-02 · WR Senior Ballers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-08-01 · Chief Peak · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Conrad Vanhyning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-31 · WR Senior Ballers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
Andrew Smith / Jake Nolan
2026-07-25 · WR Low Tri Ballers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jose Mendoza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-19 · Chief Peak · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Danny Everett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-17 · WR Low Tri Ballers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marvin Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-05 · Chief Peak · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Conrad Vanhyning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-27 · For Pete's Sake!! · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stella Dumlao-Idea mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-14 · For Pete's Sake!! · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stella Dumlao-Idea mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-06-06 · Chief Peak · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristofer Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-31 · For Pete's Sake!! · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelly Decker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
75.7%
56W–18L · 60.2% of games
4.0
35.7%
20W–36L · 45.9% of games
7.0
75%
6W–2L · 57.3% of games
8.0
25%
1W–3L · 41.8% of games
0.0mixed
90.9%
10W–1L · 65.8% of games
7.0mixed
78.8%
41W–11L · 59.5% of games
8.0mixed
41.7%
5W–7L · 48.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
99 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
53 matches
#1 Singles
17%
42 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert