← Search

Sue Hayes

— year-end
30 matches · 11W–19L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Sue Hayes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history30 matches
L
Nancy Williams / Kathy Murphy
2026-09-06 · LBKU-Kucharski River Run · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carol Geisler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-01 · LBKU-Kucharski River Run · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Barbara Stoner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-06 · LBKU-Kucharski River Run · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Anne Michael
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2023-09-28 · LSHA-Hayes/River Run · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Melanie Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2023-09-21 · LSHA-Hayes/River Run · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Julie Lyerly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
Katie Huffstetler / Susan Newman
2023-05-12 · LAReaves/RR · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Courtney Seiter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2023-05-05 · LAReaves/RR · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Holly Ridgway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2023-04-28 · LAReaves/RR · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with ERIN Wells
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2023-03-24 · LAReaves/RR · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Holleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
Betina Philip / Barbara Pratt
2023-03-08 · LAReaves/RR · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Holly Ridgway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2023-01-26 · RJCStanford/River Run · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holly Ridgway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
Debra Agostinelli / Christy Walker
2022-12-16 · RJCStanford/River Run · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holly Ridgway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
14.3%
2W–12L · 33.2% of games
3.5
75%
3W–1L · 58% of games
5.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 61.8% of games
6.5
0%
0W–4L · 35.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 57% of the time
#3 Doubles
57%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert