← Search

Amy Teemant

Provo, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
121 matches · 81W–40L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Amy Teemant to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history121 matches
W
2026-09-01 · Ladies In Black · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Hart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-15 · Ladies in Black · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Hart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-21 · Ladies in Black · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashlee Chappell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-03 · Utah Valley-LIB · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Michie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-1, 1-0
W
2026-02-24 · Utah Valley-LIB · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelli Lowell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-3, 1-0
L
2026-02-10 · Utah Valley-LIB · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Hart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-5
W
2026-01-20 · Utah Valley-LIB · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashlee Chappell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-3
L
2025-12-16 · Team Lowell · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelli Lowell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-12-09 · Team Lowell · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-2
L
2025-11-04 · Team Lowell · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-14 · Rotary Park-Lowell · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelli Lowell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-09-23 · Rotary Park-Lowell · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
76.2%
16W–5L · 61.8% of games
3.0
75.5%
37W–12L · 59.7% of games
3.5
53.5%
23W–20L · 51.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 37% of the time
#1 Singles
37%
45 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
17 matches
#2 Singles
5%
6 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal