← Search

Drew Corontzes

GREENVILLE, SC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
40 matches · 23W–17L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Drew Corontzes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history40 matches
W
2026-07-12 · UPTA (A) 4.0M 18 & Over (Morrison) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debbie Watson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-06-30 · UPTA40M/Knapp/Kroc · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Engel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-28 · UPTA (A) 4.0M 18 & Over (Morrison) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimey Kyker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-16 · UPTA (A) 4.0M 18 & Over (Morrison) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Joyce mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-07 · UPTA (A) 4.0M 18 & Over (Morrison) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimey Kyker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Hunter Gray / Eli Herrnstadt
2026-06-06 · UPTA18T/Russell/Kroc · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mitch Appleby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-02 · UPTA40M/Knapp/Kroc · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Engel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-31 · UPTA (A) 4.0M 18 & Over (Morrison) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah LaMunion mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-05-13 · UPTA (A) 4.0M 18 & Over (Morrison) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah LaMunion mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-03-29 · UPTA40A/Gibson/Kroc · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-22 · UPTA40A/Gibson/Kroc · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-18 · UPTA40A/Gibson/Kroc · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rob Knapp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
63.6%
14W–8L · 54.3% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 53.3% of games
4.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
8 matches
#1 Singles
15%
6 matches
#2 Singles
8%
3 matches
#3 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams