← Search

Emily Hyder

CHARLOTTE, NC
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
33 matches · 31W–2L · seasons 2022–2024

Captains: add Emily Hyder to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history33 matches
W
2024-03-13 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Frain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2024-02-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Frain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2024-02-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cassandra Andrus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2024-02-19 · LCTA39/DANIEL/MPR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cassandra Andrus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2024-02-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Frain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2024-02-13 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Frain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2024-02-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Frain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2023-11-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cassandra Andrus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2023-10-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cassandra Andrus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2023-10-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Frain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2023-10-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Frain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2023-10-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cassandra Andrus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2021–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
4.0
93.9%
31W–2L · 62% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 73% of the time
#1 Doubles
73%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova