← Search

Jeff Heinz

CARY, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 41W–49L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jeff Heinz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
W
2026-08-30 · Ra.Yasin18C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Okeith GREENE
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-23 · Ra.Yasin18C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jackson Simonson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-04 · CAS.Labie · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Wells
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-02 · Ra.Yasin18C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Parker Swift
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
Kevin Lee / David Zies
2026-07-30 · CAS.Nealis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lee Hayes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-12 · CAS.Labie · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Winters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-09 · CAS.Nealis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lee Hayes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-02 · CAS.Nealis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ryan Douglas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-19 · CAS.Nealis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lee Hayes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-12 · CAS.Nealis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ryan Douglas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · CAS.Labie · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ivan Lacross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-06 · CAS.Labie · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Thomas Brugler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
44.2%
23W–29L · 47% of games
3.5
27.8%
5W–13L · 42.9% of games
6.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 45.5% of games
6.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 60.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 31% of the time
#1 Singles
31%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
12 matches
#2 Singles
13%
12 matches
#3 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer