← Search

Tamra Loeb

— year-end
109 matches · 73W–36L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Tamra Loeb to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history109 matches
W
2026-08-15 · TEAMCORBIN · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Diana Carmichael
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-07-17 · Tri-Me/Bourne/MHCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melanie Truhett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-05 · TEAMCORBIN · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathy Corbin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-06-30 · Team Corbin/Corbin/MHCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melanie Truhett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-19 · Braemar Vixens/Nagler-Parent/MHCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with MJ Nejad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-14 · LA - Femme FEDAL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Summer Williamson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-08 · Get a grip · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melanie Truhett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-06-07 · LA - Femme FEDAL · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teri Gustafson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-06 · Team Corbin/Corbin/MHCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melanie Truhett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-05 · Braemar Vixens/Nagler-Parent/MHCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melanie Truhett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · Team Corbin/Corbin/MHCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzy Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-08 · Braemar Vixens/Nagler-Parent/MHCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robin Hittelman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
Teams60 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
85.2%
23W–4L · 60.3% of games
4.0
60.3%
41W–27L · 54.4% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 62.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert