← Search

Tana Jankowiak

Gaithersburg, MD
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
273 matches · 152W–121L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Tana Jankowiak to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history273 matches
L
2026-09-02 · Team 6 Yang · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Miyuki Sato
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-3
W
Adriene Jordan / David Brown
2026-08-31 · Team 2 FDP · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Chen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
Cory Brown / John Williamson
2026-08-26 · Team 2 FDP · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Chen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-19 · Team 2 FDP · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jun Chang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 5-2
L
2026-08-18 · Team 6 Yang · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with XIAOZHEN LIN
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6
W
2026-08-12 · Team 2 FDP · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jun Chang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-08-04 · Team 2 FDP · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jun Chang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-04 · Team 6 Yang · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Miyuki Sato
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-1
W
2026-08-02 · Team 2 FDP · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Chen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-07-28 · Team 6 Yang · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chloe Zhang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-3
L
2026-07-26 · Team 2 FDP · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Chen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-22 · Dong - Bluefin · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Megan He
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams76 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.5
61%
36W–23L · 56.4% of games
4.0
33.3%
17W–34L · 44.4% of games
6.5
50%
7W–7L · 53.5% of games
7.0
84.6%
11W–2L · 63.2% of games
7.5
41.2%
7W–10L · 51% of games
8.0
40%
2W–3L · 45% of games
0.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
69.6%
32W–14L · 58% of games
7.5mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 45.3% of games
8.0mixed
40.7%
11W–16L · 46.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
84 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
78 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
68 matches
#1 Singles
10%
27 matches
#2 Singles
6%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal