← Search

Dana Hill

Wichita, KS
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
161 matches · 59W–102L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Dana Hill to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history161 matches
L
2026-08-06 · Tillison · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jonathan Thorne mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-28 · Tillison · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Timothy Peters mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-12 · Dotise · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paula Bette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-12 · Dotise · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paula Bette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-11 · Abbas/Duran · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathleen Bagwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-11 · Abbas/Duran · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paula Bette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-07-10 · Tillison · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daniel Peters mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-28 · Dotise · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paula Bette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-21 · Dotise · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paula Bette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-20 · Abbas/Duran · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paula Bette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · Abbas/Duran · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paula Bette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-17 · Dotise · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bobbie Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
60%
3W–2L · 61.5% of games
3.0
43.6%
44W–57L · 47.1% of games
3.5
16%
4W–21L · 36.3% of games
6.0
27.3%
3W–8L · 44.8% of games
6.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 42.5% of games
7.0mixed
20%
2W–8L · 41.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
41 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert