← Search

Allen Amir Parvizian

Covington, LA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
116 matches · 49W–67L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Allen Amir Parvizian to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history116 matches
L
2026-09-03 · Barach-40/6.5/M-StoneCreek · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mark Farrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-06 · Barach-40/6.5/M-StoneCreek · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mark Farrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-31 · Parvizian/18s/3.0/SC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Boehm mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
Jean Paul Templet / Kate Smith
2026-07-11 · Parvizian/18s/3.0/SC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica Hollister mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · Parvizian/40s/3.0/SC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Boehm mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-29 · Parvizian/40s/3.0/SC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Danielle Hufft mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-19 · Parvizian/18s/3.0/SC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Judlin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-30 · Parvizian/18s/3.0/SC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Judlin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-26 · Parvizian/40s/3.0/SC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Boehm mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-13 · Parvizian-18/3.5/M/StoneCreek · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ty McGuire
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-12 · Parvizian-18/3.5/M/StoneCreek · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jason Rolling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-29 · Parvizian-18/3.0/M/StoneCreek · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ray Rando
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams93 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
51.2%
22W–21L · 51.8% of games
3.5
13.3%
2W–13L · 30.5% of games
6.5
38.9%
7W–11L · 48.5% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
55%
11W–9L · 49.1% of games
3.5mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 36.8% of games
6.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 52.9% of games
6.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 40% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 50% of the time
#2 Doubles
50%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
42 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
12 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer