← Search

Jeremy Calbreath

Midlothian, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
217 matches · 164W–53L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jeremy Calbreath to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history217 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Dream Team - Miranowicz · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jonathan McDorman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-06 · MAC Mid-court Crisis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ariel Mejia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-29 · MAC Mid-court Crisis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Bill James
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-22 · Dream Team - Miranowicz · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with James Holland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-16 · Dream Team - Miranowicz · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with James Holland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · MAC Mid-court Crisis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ariel Mejia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-14 · MAC Mid-court Crisis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kyle Bagley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-08-02 · Dream Team - Miranowicz · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dylan Brod
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-01 · MAC Mid-court Crisis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ariel Mejia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-25 · CORA Mercurio · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ken Hammond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-07-24 · CORA Mercurio · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ken Hammond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-19 · CORA Mercurio · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
3.0
62.9%
22W–13L · 56.5% of games
3.5
66.7%
22W–11L · 55.2% of games
6.5
66.7%
18W–9L · 54.3% of games
7.5
75%
3W–1L · 49.3% of games
3.0mixed
90.9%
10W–1L · 66.7% of games
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
100%
6W–0L · 75.8% of games
6.0mixed
93.8%
15W–1L · 68% of games
6.5mixed
81.8%
18W–4L · 60.9% of games
7.0mixed
80%
32W–8L · 61.7% of games
7.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
90.9%
10W–1L · 60.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
83 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
69 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
50 matches
#2 Singles
3%
7 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert