← Search

Anita Crawford

Hartsville, SC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
37 matches · 10W–27L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Anita Crawford to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history37 matches
L
Haley Wightman / Helen Carroll
2026-08-26 · PD18/Askins/HCC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Allyne Askins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-24 · PD40/Askins/HCC · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Betsy Kraus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-15 · PD18/Askins/HCC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Barbara Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-11 · PD18/Askins/HCC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Barbara Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-26 · PD40/Askins/HCC · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Betsy Kraus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
Todd Johnson / Robin Downing
2026-06-18 · PD40/Askins/HCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Schock mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-03 · PD40/Askins/HCC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Darrin St Ours mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Ponder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-15 · PD55/Askins/HCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barbara Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
Kathy Brown / Jane Ponder
2026-04-14 · PD18/INGRAM/BYP · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Renee Douglas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-06 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Terrie Reames
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-01 · PD55/Askins/HCC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Ponder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 41% of games
3.0
34.8%
8W–15L · 40.6% of games
5.5
0%
0W–4L · 35.2% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
11%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
8%
3 matches
#3 Singles
5%
2 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova