← Search

Anna Sison

Charlotte, NC
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 47W–39L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Anna Sison to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history86 matches
W
2026-09-09 · BBaker (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Morgan Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-09-08 · ABroemel (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Allison Purmort
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-09-02 · BBaker (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Spencer Stoakley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
Stephanie Rock / Trisha Smith
2026-09-01 · ABroemel (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rachel Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-12 · BBaker (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Spencer Stoakley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-22 · CJacobs/NBadr (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Chaffman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-08 · CJacobs/NBadr (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Timothy Whelan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-29 · BBaker (Park Road) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Kopec
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-22 · BBaker (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Purmort
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-15 · BBaker (Park Road) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Spencer Stoakley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
Emilia Anderson / Katie White
2026-03-04 · BBaker (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kara Tringali
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2025-10-01 · BBaker (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Spencer Stoakley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
61.9%
13W–8L · 55.3% of games
3.5
33.3%
6W–12L · 51.3% of games
5.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
59.3%
16W–11L · 52.9% of games
3.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 44.9% of games
6.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 60% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
24 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams