Elizabeth Huffman
Wheaton, IL
158 matches · 105W–53L · seasons 2020–2026
Captains: add Elizabeth Huffman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history158 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2024–2027
CHI E 18W4.5 4.Score Ezike Sun 3 $25
CHI E M18.8.0 4.RT Spinazze Fri 7 $29
CHI E M18.9.0 1.Tam Copland Sun 5 $25
CDTA E 40&OW4.0 2Tam Corey Sun 11 $22
CDTA E 40&OW4.5 2Naper Blaauw Sat 4 $24
CDTA E M40&O8.0 1RT Lam1 Sat 2 $27
CDTA S 18&OW4.5 1.Score Kamel Sat 11 $20
CDTA S 40&OW4.5 4.NTC Blaauw Sat 4 $24
CDTA S ComboW8.5 3.RCLB Cal Wed 7 $22
CDTA S M40&O8.0 2.RT Lam-1 Sun 4 $27
CDTA W 18&OW4.5 1.Score Kamel Sun 1 $20
CDTA W 40&OW4.5 2.Naper Blaauw Sat 4 $24
CDTA W ComboW8.5 3.RCLB Cal Sat 4 $22
CDTA W M18&O8.0 7.Gnbk Tysl Sun 7 $30
CDTA W M40&O8.0 1.RT Lam-1 Sat 7 $27
CDTA W TriWHi 3.RT Chala Fri 7 $27
NITA E 40W40f Score-Knutte/Odenbeck
NITA E 80MX40a Naperville-Podwika
NITA S 85CWb Vaughan-McClure/McTeague
NITA W 80MX40c Naperville-Podwika
NITA W 85CWd Vaughan-McClure/McTeague
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
61.5%
8W–5L · 54.2% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
70.7%
41W–17L · 61.5% of games
4.5
58.8%
10W–7L · 49.4% of games
8.5
45%
9W–11L · 52.2% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 63% of games
7.5mixed
100%
5W–0L · 71.4% of games
8.0mixed
83.3%
15W–3L · 61.6% of games
8.5mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 43% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
69 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
25 matches
#1 Singles
10%
15 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.