← Search

Christie Crawley

Jenks, OK
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
82 matches · 42W–40L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Christie Crawley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history82 matches
W
2026-04-27 · Green/Hale/LF 18s 3.0W · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with LaQuisha Epps
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-04-21 · Green/Hale/LF 18s 3.0W · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jaqueline Troyke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-03-26 · Green/Hale/LF 18s 3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vivian Rogers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-04 · Seifried/LF/3.0WDAY · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Black
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-10-16 · OK/Seifried/40&over3.0W · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Oanh Stanger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-10-06 · Seifried/LF/3.0WDAY · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-09-30 · OK/Seifried/40&over3.0W · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Oanh Stanger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2025-09-29 · Seifried/LF/3.0WDAY · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vivian Rogers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-09-15 · Seifried/LF/3.0WDAY · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2025-06-09 · Seifried/LF · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karina Johannes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-05-13 · Seifried/LF · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jacqlyn Hurst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-04-21 · Seifried/LF · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Vidal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
50%
14W–14L · 49.7% of games
3.0
51.9%
28W–26L · 49.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
14 matches
#1 Singles
11%
9 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova