← Search

Julea Hovey

— year-end
74 matches · 47W–27L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Julea Hovey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history74 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Odell/Rogerson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chrissa Matthews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-09-03 · CCRC/Landon · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Trudie Gill-Keenly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-29 · Odell Rogerson Combo · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Angela Magnuson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-27 · CCRC/Landon · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natalie Stephens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-25 · Odell/Rogerson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angela Magnuson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-22 · Odell Rogerson Combo · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sharon McKool
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-08 · Odell Rogerson Combo · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Angela Magnuson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-01 · Odell Rogerson Combo · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brooke Homan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-29 · Odell-Uhle · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lori Pope
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-28 · CCRC Barksdale · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jeannette Hammers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-27 · CCRC Barksdale · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Denise Warkenthien
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-18 · Odell-Uhle · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brooke Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
Teams50 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
60.9%
28W–18L · 53.9% of games
7.5
61.1%
11W–7L · 53% of games
8.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 58.1% of games
8.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 57.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 70% of the time
#1 Doubles
70%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer