← Search

Stacie Watford

— year-end
29 matches · 20W–9L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Stacie Watford to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history29 matches
W
2026-09-13 · PD40/Perkins/FTC · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Melissa Boyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-09-02 · PD40/Siegal/FTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Beth Gunter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-09-01 · PD40/Siegal/FTC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Beth Gunter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-26 · PD40/Siegal/FTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Laura Buen Abad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-12 · PD40/Siegal/FTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Beth Gunter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
Rashmi Anki / Susan Brown
2026-07-20 · PD40/Perkins/FTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julieanne Yarnal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-19 · PD40/Perkins/FTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lorraine Tindal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-11 · PD 3.0M 40 & Over (Lee) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with HoChieh Huang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-03 · PD40/Siegal/FTC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ning Wharton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-04-26 · PD40/Siegal/FTC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lorraine Tindal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-18 · PD40/Siegal/FTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Gunter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
Barbara Lee / Kathy Brown
2026-04-06 · PD40/Siegal/FTC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathleen Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
Teams34 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 57.7% of games
3.0
78.6%
11W–3L · 66.2% of games
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
60%
3W–2L · 54.4% of games
3.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
4 matches
#1 Singles
10%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams