← Search

Dustin Applebaum

Tampa, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 44W–20L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Dustin Applebaum to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
L
2026-08-25 · HCC Thunder & Lightning/Halm · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kevin Brick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-17 · HCC Thunder & Lightning/Halm · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Arun Arockia Charles Vanathuchinnappan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-08-09 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-08-08 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-01 · RCSP Fantauzzo · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Thomas Gross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-18 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-06-27 · RCSP Yilmaz 40+ · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brent Litwak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-20 · RCSP Fantauzzo · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Maddaloni
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-19 · PINELLAS/Holliday · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Breezy Paulus mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-13 · RCSP Fantauzzo · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-23 · RCSP Fantauzzo · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Dennis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
78.6%
22W–6L · 62.6% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 55.8% of games
7.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 50.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
11 matches
#1 Singles
16%
10 matches
#2 Singles
13%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert