← Search

Robert Tangeman

Gainesville, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
217 matches · 146W–71L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Robert Tangeman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history217 matches
L
2026-08-25 · JTC-Booth · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marlene Townsend mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-23 · JTC-Booth · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Booth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-21 · Westside/Lob Don't Lie - Harloff · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Emilee Cato mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-08-09 · #3 Doubles · with John Weissler championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Marc Rothstein championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-24 · Westside/Lob Don't Lie - Harloff · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Emilee Cato mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-07-11 · JTC-Booth · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Booth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-28 · Hawkstone 7.0 X · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Catalanotto mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-21 · Hawkstone 7.0 X · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tania Alavi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-14 · 300 Club Wimsett/Harloff · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-07 · 300 Club Wimsett/Harloff · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lawrence Hooghuis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
Jerry Clark / Carl Miller
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · with Lawrence Hooghuis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5
100%
11W–0L · 77.9% of games
3.0
71.1%
32W–13L · 57.7% of games
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 45.1% of games
5.5
90%
9W–1L · 72.8% of games
6.5
52.9%
9W–8L · 53.5% of games
7.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 58.9% of games
2.5mixed
92.9%
13W–1L · 72.3% of games
6.0mixed
82.2%
37W–8L · 61.4% of games
7.0mixed
43.5%
10W–13L · 49.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
72 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
72 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
71 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert