← Search

Lisa Amos

— year-end
86 matches · 55W–31L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Lisa Amos to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history86 matches
L
Amy Anderson / Courtney Lewis
2026-08-13 · LCTA40/Baumann/DIC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lauren Pelsnik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-30 · LCTA40/Baumann/DIC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kelly Desmond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-05 · LCTA18/Leeke/DIC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jana Upshaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-15 · LCTA18/Leeke/DIC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bria Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-08 · LCTA18/Leeke/DIC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sienna Amos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
Stephanie Davis / Diane Rozier
2026-05-03 · LCTA18/Leeke/DIC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jana Upshaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-02 · LCTA18/Gaunt/DIC · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-27 · LCTA18/Staebell/DIC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-25 · LCTA40/Baumann/DIC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lani Staebell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-5
L
2026-03-19 · LCTA18/Staebell/DIC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Ohlson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-03-12 · LCTA18/Staebell/DIC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Baumann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-11 · LCTA40/Baumann/DIC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqueline Krueger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Teams9 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
71.4%
20W–8L · 58.5% of games
3.5
59.6%
31W–21L · 54.2% of games
6.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
23 matches
#1 Singles
26%
22 matches
#2 Singles
19%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova