← Search

Tom Christiansen

— year-end
28 matches · 11W–17L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Tom Christiansen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history28 matches
L
2025-10-11 · BIR CHRISTIANSEN · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-09-27 · BIR CHRISTIANSEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shiraz Rehman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2025-09-20 · BIR CHRISTIANSEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shiraz Rehman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-05-31 · BIR CHRISTIANSON · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-03-22 · BIR CHRISTIANSON · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-03-16 · Oak Creek/Rajani-Deleonardis M8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kamran Mir
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-03-15 · BIR CHRISTIANSON · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Martinez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-02-09 · RTC MERKLIN · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kermit Gable
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-02-08 · BIR CHRISTIANSEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2025-01-25 · Oak Creek/Rajani-Deleonardis M8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kamran Mir
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-01-19 · RTC MERKLIN · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christopher Musgrove
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-01-18 · BIR CHRISTIANSEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shiraz Rehman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
Teams45 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 51.8% of games
4.0
28.6%
4W–10L · 45.6% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
9 matches
#1 Singles
29%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer