← Search

Amanda Cortes

West Chester, PA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
36 matches · 23W–13L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Amanda Cortes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history36 matches
W
2026-06-04 · Chester Valley · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vanessa Melvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-28 · Chester Valley · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dana Matkovic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-14 · Chester Valley · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vanessa Melvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-04-30 · Chester Valley · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kirsten Kane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-04-16 · Chester Valley · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vanessa Melvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-06-17 · Ace Ace Baby · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-06-12 · Chester Valley · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vanessa Melvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-06-10 · Ace Ace Baby · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-06-03 · Ace Ace Baby · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-05-27 · Ace Ace Baby · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-05-22 · Chester Valley · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vanessa Melvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2025-05-20 · Ace Ace Baby · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
60%
15W–10L · 54.6% of games
3.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 55.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 33% of the time
#1 Singles
33%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
17%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams