← Search

Drew Bennett

Philadelphia, PA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 62W–24L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Drew Bennett to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history86 matches
W
Parker Kitterman / Jennifer Moore
2026-09-12 · Penn Poachers · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Haelee Chin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-08 · Snipers · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lonnie Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-02 · Snipers · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Abhay Singh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-20 · Ace Chasers · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brett Weinstock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-13 · Ace Chasers · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ning Zhou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-06 · Ace Chasers · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ning Zhou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · Ace Chasers · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rishi Shetty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-26 · Ace Chasers · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael Kara
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-16 · Snipers · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ben Lehman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · Ace Chasers · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Roman Pitula
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-01-10 · Penn Poachers · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Hayden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-11-23 · Penn Poachers · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lynn Selhat mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
100%
4W–0L · 66.7% of games
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
92.9%
13W–1L · 61.8% of games
4.5
68.3%
28W–13L · 56% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 24.7% of games
8.0mixed
83.3%
15W–3L · 59.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
17 matches
#1 Singles
17%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova